John Abbott Melbourne THE BLACKSHIRTS

From the Blackshirts website:



THE
BLACK SHIRTS
Thank God for the Black shirts. The only real power that can put an end to the evil imposed on marriage, family and children and bring back family values.
Don't be intimidated by restraining orders, family court applications or for that matter - members of the legal profession.
As mothers or fathers, you have a right and indeed a duty to defend your marriage - family and especially - your children.
The Black shirts are dedicated to support any and all who crave to bring back the very term marriage and family and stand against any force or power bent on corrupting children or the dismantling of the family unit or the destruction of the marriage.
The fundamental code of the Blackshirts is to always stay within the bounds of the law but to carry out within those bounds actions that will highlight and expose those who dare to try and undermine marriage, family and corrupt children.
Do not feel alone when you are faced with intervention orders (AVO) for there are over 1,000 applications per week. Do not be frightened when you are faced with family court proceedings especially when divorce is an issue for there are over 1,000 divorce applications per week. Do not be dismayed when they threaten to take your children from you for well over 1,000 fathers and mothers are faced with the same prospect each week. Do not be intimidated with the Child Support Agency for over 1,000 parents a week share your concerns. In short, you are not alone.
The answer, fight the good fight together for united we stand and put this attack on family values to an abrupt end. In short - put those who would corrupt our children, undermine our marriage and compromise the family unit into sewers where they belong.
It is the contention of the Blackshirts that restraining orders are a blemish to the very term democracy and freedom. Let the individual who has been accused of any crime be dealt with by the letter of the law and be given his or her right to be assumed innocent until proven guilty and not be restrained of their freedom on heresay and innuendoes only to be denied of what is rightfully theirs.
Let a man or woman rear their children without third party interference.Let a man or woman enjoy their entitlements in their marriage without being forced to accept a wife/husband swapping game which they call divorce and impose adultery upon them.
Let the law protect the innocent and condemn the guilty and stop what the has done in the family court in many cases to condemn and penalize the innocent for the sake of the guilty.
The Blackshirts say enough is enough. What do you say?
Had enough? Join us and put this tragedy to an abrupt end and reinstate family values back where they should be.
The children are waiting for us - the family unit is waiting for us - the marriage is waiting for us and we are waiting for you. ACT NOW.
Simply write your name and phone number or your address and a member of the Blackshirts will contact you in about 3 days.
email to: secretery@blackshirts.info
Since 1975, there have been over 1 Million divorces:
Since 1975, there have been 200 divorces granted every working day.
Since 1975, there have been 1000 divorces granted every working week.
The family breakdown has now reached epidemic proportions and such epidemic continues unchecked to this day.
Is there help for the Family; is there help or home for our marriages? Is there help or hope for our children?
THERE IS ONLY ONE HOPE, ONE CHANCE, AND ONE OPPORTUNITY!
The only natural force available to protect children is the father and family.
It is the duty and obligation and the right of every father to protect his children against any moral and physical harm.
We, the men, have for too long neglected our children and it's time that this is corrected.
It's time that we, the men, protected our children.
It's time that we, the men, protect our families.
It's time that we, the men, protect our marriages.
We, the men, cannot protect our children unless we first protect our marriages and our families.
The issue is not whether we are able under the so called present system of Law to protect our marriages - families - children; For when it comes to protecting our children, the Law must stop at the gate and the Law can only question as to whether there was excessive force. The question then remains, what force was necessary? And in my view, a jury would find it difficult to place itself in the shoes of a father who at the time was concerned only with the protection of his children.
Some men believe that they cannot protect their children without offending society. But they are wrong in this conception. Society expects fathers and indeed parents and families to protect their children and this can be clearly seen when we take into account that society all too quickly expresses; The welfare of children is the paramount consideration.
In such expression, we can find the true intentions of society and what it expects from the father, the family and society as a whole.
In the event that a man, a father, finding himself in a situation that implicates his children, does society expect such a man to consider first his welfare? The answer is NO; Society expects such a man to "put the welfare of the children first".
No man can claim that he was unable to protect his children because the 'Law' might penalise him. Society expects that man to "Put his children's welfare first" above his own welfare and interests.
The law is based on moral grounds and not on technical grounds. It is not for a man, a father, to first study the law and then decide if and when and what means to use to protect his own children. Every man has the God given knowledge, and facilities to protect his children, and the ability is the embodiment of his conscience.
Where does a man who believes in his children go to be amongst other men who have the same intentions of protecting their children - families - marriage?
Where does a man go to reverse the injustices imposed on him, his children, his Family, his marriage?
Where does a man go to re-unite his Family so that his children may dwell?
Where does a man go to get support to so "protect"?
Where does the buck stop?
WHY BLACK?
What colour do judges and lawyers wear? What other colour would one wear when mourning the loss of a loved one?
WHY THE CAP?
It gets hot standing in the sun in summer and it keeps the head warm in winter! It helps to identify us to each other and the public! Police wear hats don't they? So does the salvation army!They look better than wigs, don't they?
WHY THE FACE COVER?
Section 121 (family law act) prohibits us from identifying ourselves. We would gladly step forward and identify ourselves and the abuse being inflicted on us and our children were it not for corrupt laws being used to hide the abuse of children and families.
WHY "THE BLACK SHIRTS"
Our members needed a name that would stand out. A name that immediately identified us when in the public arena. We think its much better than the names given to loving fathers by other gutless members of the legal fraternity.
In spite of the fact that we live in a Christian democracy, or at least we are led to believe that we live in a Christian democracy, here are two examples on how the Chief Justice and the family court have interpreted the terms:
"Christian Democracy and The Family Unit"
Case 1
A father's application to the family court was to have contact to his two sons. The family court rejected the application even though there were no allegations of any wrong drawing towards his children. The presiding judge noted that the father had great love for his children. The only criteria for the father to comply with was that he first change his attitude towards his wife's partner and companion.
The father could not change his attitude towards the wife's partner and companion as that would be to accept and teach adultery, the breakdown of the family unit and the corruption of the marriage, to his own children. This father was a practicing Catholic. The result was that the father did not have contact with his children for over 10 years. So much for a Christian democracy.
Case 2
A father made application to the family court to enforce existing family court orders for contact with his son. The family court set aside all existing orders and ordered psychiatric assessment for his son and himself. The psychiatrist made recommendations that the father not associate or be a member of an organisation called "the black shirts" this was a pre requisite to supervised telephone calls and one hour of contract.
The father claimed his democratic right to be a member of any organisation he chose. The family court did not allow him to challenge this issue and no proof was provided of any wrong doing by the named organisation. The father's application was dismissed. This father has not seen his son for more than nine months. So much for democracy and freedom of will.
We could list hundreds if not thousands of such cases and those who have tasted the poison of the system know only too well that the above two cases are not only believable but also very true.
These actions by family court judges are supported by corrupt legislation. Society pays dearly for the privilege, to the tune of over one hundred million dollars per year, with the overall expenditure relating to the so called family breakdown, rising each year with over fifty thousand divorces rising to over 9 billion dollars.
This money should be spent on families, the elderly, children and the welfare of the nation.
The black shirts are proud to oppose the current legislation and the attitudes and actions of judges of the family court.
The children of Australia are in desperate need of rescuefrom this Government's blatant abuse of power.
We invite all loving parents to join us in our fight to protect the traditional family unit and our precious children.
For more information (the truth) go to www.blackshirts.info or phone 0414886776 / 0402623800
Solution
The solution;
Reinstate marriage as recognised by law.
The Marriage Act:
Marriage is the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.
Reinstate the family as the fundamental group unit of society and most be protected particularly while it is responsible for the care of dependant children.
We, the Black Shirts ask no more but will settle for no less.
The first port of call must be to create an inpregnable human shield against any and all intrusions.
It is not the concern of the Black Shirts as to whether a husband and wife live together or not, and nor should it be the concern of anyone else. However, it should and must be the concern of every degent person if the family, marriage and children are corrupted.
Especially by an intruder who would dare to try and replace the mother or the father to the children.
Such a creature must realise that no one can replace the mother or the father and such an attempt will inevitably incur the wrath of the Black Shirts and every decent Australian.
The Black Shirts stand ready to make the lives of such creatures as difficult as possible within the bounds of the law.
The Black Shirts are adamant to bring back to fundamentals all institutions that have a direct and indirect impact on marriage family and children. Whoever and what ever they maybe - No exceptions.
Reason
The reason for the Blackshirts
It is ardent belief of the black shirts that the family court and the legal profression have failed the family - the Marriage and the welfare of children and it appears that they (the family court and the legal profession) have no intention to change the status quo.
We also believe that parliament, although desperate to find a solution to this ever growing problem, have lost hope in trying to stem the (so called) breakdown of the marriage which has been and presently is at 200 per day, at 1000 per week and 50,000 per year.
The future, it seems, holds no hope for the marriage, the family, and of course the children.
We are mindful that our children are taking their lives, abusing drugs, suffering abortions at a disturbing level and many of our children are being treated as hostages by their own parents more often than not by the mother.
The above reasons are just some of the reasons why the Black Shirts exist. But even more importantly is the fact that our children are made to suffer the intrusion of strangers into their lives who more often than not are imposed upon the family by their mother.
We say that the "intruder" corrupts the morals of young by mere fact that they are there, because all children are loyal to their mother and their father.
When a (so called) man is imposed into the family home, the children automatically see this as a betrayal to the father and if a (so called) woman is imposed into the family home the children automatically see this as a betrayal to the mother.
We, the Blackshirts say that if we want our children to be morally bound, decent, dignified, honest, loyal, law abiding and responsible.
We the parents must first be all of the above because all children see adults as an example on how to behave.
This is so. Especially in their own parents
3/ To date, and especially since 1975, the example has, to say the least, not been good.
The Black Shirt Code:
1. Protect marriage - family - children
2. Re-instate the meaning of marriage, family and children.
3. Discourage any intrusion into the family home
4. Promote the best of human traits to children and discourage any alternative
5. At all times promote and stay within the bounds of the law
Which is the fundamental reason as to why the Black shirts sometimes wear masks and that is to ensure to not offend section 121 of the family law act in that indentities of parties may not be divulged.
email the Secretary at secretary@blackshirts.info
and we will answer any questions and/or offer assistance if we are able.








http://www.blackshirts.info/index2.html


http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/12/19/1040174344351.html


http://www.personsmissing.org/blackshirts.html